<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bank account frauds &#8211; Hacking or End Point Data Loss?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.dataresolve.com/archives/162/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.dataresolve.com/archives/162</link>
	<description>Secure your digital data with data loss prevention</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 17:05:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://blog.dataresolve.com/archives/162/comment-page-1#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dataresolve.com/?p=162#comment-419</guid>
		<description>The reason companies are going for different kind of data security implementations is because at least they don&#039;t want to make everything open. to know more about security</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason companies are going for different kind of data security implementations is because at least they don&#8217;t want to make everything open. to know more about security</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://blog.dataresolve.com/archives/162/comment-page-1#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dataresolve.com/?p=162#comment-409</guid>
		<description>Dear Urba, i fully agree with you that there is no perfect defense, but, the reason companies are going for different kind of data security implementations is because at least they dont want to make everything open. Its better to have even 90% security than having zero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Urba, i fully agree with you that there is no perfect defense, but, the reason companies are going for different kind of data security implementations is because at least they dont want to make everything open. Its better to have even 90% security than having zero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urba</title>
		<link>http://blog.dataresolve.com/archives/162/comment-page-1#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>Urba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 06:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dataresolve.com/?p=162#comment-400</guid>
		<description>There is no perfect defense. The more a person resists, the more damage gets in response.  Thanks for arctikle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no perfect defense. The more a person resists, the more damage gets in response.  Thanks for arctikle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In Data Loss Situations, Bring Bloggers into the Fold</title>
		<link>http://blog.dataresolve.com/archives/162/comment-page-1#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>In Data Loss Situations, Bring Bloggers into the Fold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 20:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dataresolve.com/?p=162#comment-135</guid>
		<description>[...] They document each development. They examine the intricacies of the case. They delve into the nuance of IT security. And when the time comes for the traditional media outlets to run their inevitable follow-ups, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] They document each development. They examine the intricacies of the case. They delve into the nuance of IT security. And when the time comes for the traditional media outlets to run their inevitable follow-ups, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
